NOW:53150:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
52°
H 68° L 37°
Clear | 5MPH
  • Print

Muskego middle schools consider wide-ranging changes

District unveils plan for longer classes and special studies

Nov. 29, 2011 | 4 comments

Muskego - Sweeping middle school changes - including trading the current 53-minute classes for 75-minute classes for core subjects and adding 25-minute intervention/study hall/enrichment electives sessions -will be discussed and possibly approved by the Muskego-Norway School Board on Dec. 5.

The longer classes were seen as a way to help teachers, particularly in science, complete study units. And the proposal also would rejuvenate the electives selection, lengthen the school day 10 minutes and start language or music in sixth grade, a year earlier than now.

The first phase of the plan that doesn't include new electives would need no new staff.

Except for the new electives, the plan could start next fall. New electives would have to be developed through the district's normal process and be implemented in fall of 2013.

Greater than good

The district's 38-member Middle Level Program Review Team worked 11 months on reviewing the two middle schools to develop the recommendations.

The team consists of parents, teachers, administrators and even one student. It held meetings, did surveys and delved into educational research to see how the best middle schools get results.

Superintendent of Schools Joe Schroeder said the plan has a lot of good things, if all the details can be worked out.

"It does help us move from good to great," Schroeder said.

Customized study

Probably the most unique feature of the plan is the 25-minute intervention/enrichment period, which would either address students' special needs or allow them to explore new educational territory.

The review team found that a powerful element of the most successful schools was providing quick responses when children begin to struggle either academically or behaviorally.

Students who need extra help could get it in those proposed 25-minute periods. Students who don't could choose either a study hall or an enrichment session, project-based studies focused on meeting their natural curiosity about the world around them.

Careful consideration

But when the middle school proposal was unveiled last week, the School Board reacted initially with an air of caution.

Board member Brett Hyde said he liked the focus on reading and math, but wondered if teachers would be able to hold students' interest in 75-minute classes. He also liked the earlier language option.

Whether language studies that start at the middle school level would be accepted by colleges as fulfilling their foreign language requirements worried board member Lisa Warwick.

Responding, Schroeder said students will probably be tested, anyway.

Although the first phase would not need additional staff, board member Dean Strom wanted a better handle on whether more teachers would be needed for the proposed new electives in 2013.

Finally, board member Eric Schroeder wanted to know if the proposed longer classes would mean larger classes.

"That's a fair question," the superintendent said and promised to have the answer by next week.

Another worry board members expressed was how to keep students from wandering the halls because of the irregular class times.

NEXT STEP

WHAT: Muskego-Norway School Board consideration and possible adoption of sweeping changes to the middle schools

WHEN: 7:30 p.m. Dec. 5

WHERE: Muskego-Norway Educational Services Center, W18763 Woods Road

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50 | 100
  1. This sounds promising and positive. I wonder what the teachers' union has to say about this. Oh, wait... They've been rendered insignificant in matters relating to the education of children. Otherwise, you know for sure that they'd be whining and complaining about getting extra pay, longer class times, tenured teachers, etc.
    With WEAC out of the way, see how school districts will come up with inventive ways to educate children.
  2. Bob, whether you like it or not, teachers have a wealth of information on how to improve education, but for the most part, they are never asked. The head honchos in our school system have myriad questions, but rarely do they ask the people who have most of the answers - the students and the teachers. Classes of this length are not good for learning, and there is a wealth of brain research to support that. A modified block schedule with 55 minute classes M-W and longer classes on Th-F (to allow for experiments in science, etc.) has been shown to be better for students, and the school board is RIGHT to react with concern about holding kids' interest for that long. I also predict that the 25-minute intervention/enrichment period, while well-intentioned, will quickly deteriorate into a waste of everyone's time. This is one of those initiatives that administrators like to get all excited about, but then get too busy to actually successfully implement. The school would do better to use this time to incorporate more "down" time and physical activity into each student's day. The brain needs that "down" time to absorb what it has been exposed to.
  3. As a teacher and parent in a district that borders Muskego, I must say that I was surprised to read that Muskego is not ALREADY doing this! I would say that it is an educational norm in most, if not all, neighboring districts.

    Bob, It's unfortunate that you view teachers as a nemesis. Speaking from the teacher perspective, I am there for my students and desire to help shape them. I can say that it seems that the plan seems fair and does not have an affect on the teacher workday. I caution you to consider the fact that your teachers helped to shape who you are today. Do not let the political events of this past year cause you to stereotype teachers into people they are not. Do you really think teachers are bad people?

    Apple, I appreciate your comment that teachers are generally not asked about what they feel is best. For that matter, neither are students. They should be! I think Muskego did a wonderful thing by conducting a focus group that represents the myriad of those that would be affected. I am curious to know what brain research you have read that states longer class times are not good for learning? As I mentioned, most districts already do this! Fact of the matter is, if the teacher is effective, this is great for learning. If class constitutes lectures, notes and worksheets - students will not be engaged. If class is active and hands-on, a teacher can easily engage students for 75 minutes and is absolutely good for learning.

    This seems somewhat old news to me, as this is the current model schedule in most middle schools. Check into that! From a parent perspective, I find that my children have more time to complete work, ask questions, conduct inquiry and work with teams of students and teachers. Seems win-win to me! Good job, Muskego!
  4. Hey Bob,
    It's ignorant close minded people like yourself who are bringing down our society today. It's too bad that you've lost sight of all the great teachers who endlessly supported you during your school years. How quickly we forget or choose to ignore. It's a shame that there are more people out there like you who just choose to teacher bash because you can. I'm proud to be a teacher, whether I have your support or not. Obviously, you have some pent up bitterness and contempt against educators. Were you not hired for a teaching job in your younger years? Your loss, our gain.
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries